![]() ![]() I've searched quite a bit for solutions to this and it's really mostly voodoo stuff. I've never been able to completely solve the issue, so it still occurs, but it occurs very rarely now so that I can tolerate it. I've had this kind of problem for a long time with 2 different PCs and AMD GPUs (the older one was Zen1 based with a Vega 64 and the new one is Zen3 based with a RX 5700 XT). Nov 12 18:31:35 Belphegor kernel: #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page Nov 12 18:31:35 Belphegor kernel: #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Nov 12 18:31:35 Belphegor kernel: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffb7aba05206f8 Nov 12 18:31:35 Belphegor kernel: REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 100000 tries - optc1_disable_crtc line:544 Nov 12 18:31:35 Belphegor kernel: ] *ERROR* Error waiting for DMUB idle: status=3 Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: ] *ERROR* write_frame is pointing to address out of bounds Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 1000 tries - dcn20_hubp_pg_control line:516 Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 1000 tries - dcn20_dpp_pg_control line:442 Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: ] *ERROR* DC: failed to blank crtc! Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 1000 tries - dcn20_hubp_pg_control line:508 Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: REG_WAIT timeout 1us * 1000 tries - dcn20_dpp_pg_control line:434 Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: amdgpu: Failed to disable gfxoff! Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: amdgpu: SMU: response:0xFFFFFFFF for index:41 param:0x00000000 message:DisallowGfxOff? Nov 12 18:31:34 Belphegor kernel: amdgpu 0000:08:00.0: amdgpu: failed to suspend display audio Nov 12 18:31:30 Belphegor kernel: ] *ERROR* Process information: process Discord pid 86701 thread Discord:cs9 In 2017, AMD replaced all of its APUs with new Zen-based Raven Ridge chips, finally ending Bulldozer once and for all.Nov 12 18:31:28 Belphegor kernel: ] *ERROR* flip_done timed out The Bulldozer APUs even made it onto the AM4 platform and were universally panned for being pointless. AMD also failed to innovate on its APUs, so by the time the A10-7890K launched in 2016, it was just barely ahead of Intel's integrated graphics. AMD even got sued for misleading investors about the sales first-generation Llano APUs would bring in. And if you owned one of these APUs and wanted to get a discrete GPU down the line, it was highly likely you would get CPU bottlenecked.Īs expected, these APUs didn't do particularly well. But here's the other problem: Who cares? There's only a thin slice of the market that would want desktop-sized processors for gaming but don't want or can't use discrete graphics. To make up for this, APUs came with the fastest integrated graphics you could buy. Firstly, with up to four cores, these APUs were basically just quad-core FX chips and didn't have very competitive CPU performance. Phenom symbolized a new AMD that simply couldn't keep up with Intel. To make matters even worse, the first Phenom chips that hit the market had a terrible hardware bug that reduced performance by about 10%, and it took AMD half a year to ship patched CPUs. According to Anandtech, the top-end, "somber" Phenom 9900 scarcely beat even Intel's slowest quad-core Q6600, which consumed less power and was cheaper to boot. Unfortunately, Phenom dropped the ball in a big way. Intel finally beat AMD with its Core 2 chips in 2006, which put the pressure back on AMD to respond in kind. When Phenom launched in 2007, it was AMD's latest contribution to the CPU war that had been brewing since the early 2000s and that AMD had been winning with its Athlon 64 desktop and Opteron server CPUs. The other primary contributing factor involves what replaced Athlon: Phenom.Īlthough its name comes from the word 'phenomenal,' AMD's Phenom CPUs were perhaps only phenomenally disappointing. However, AMD peaked in the mid-2000s and soon entered a steady decline, thanks in part to Intel's dubious usage of marketing funds, a practice that it was sued and fined for. Then, the Athlon happened, potentially transforming AMD from an underdog into Intel's equal rival. In the beginning, AMD was merely a secondary supplier for Intel chips and later a small-time competitor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |